Axiom of Choice
Axiom 1 (Axiom of Choice). For any collection of nonempty sets \(\mathcal{A}\), there exists a function \(f:\mathcal{A}\to\cup\mathcal{A}\) such that if \(A\in\mathcal{A}\) then \(f(A)\in A\). \[\forall \mathcal{A} \ \forall A \ (A\in\mathcal{A} \implies A\neq\emptyset) \implies \exists f \ (f \subseteq \mathcal{A} \times \cup\mathcal{A} \land (A\in\mathcal{A} \implies \exists!y \ (((A,y)\in f) \land (y\in A))))\]
Axiom 2 (Well-Ordering Theorem). For any set \(X\), there exists a relation \(\leq\) on \(X\) such that \((X,\leq)\) is a well-ordered set.
Axiom 3 (Zorn’s Lemma). If \((X,\leq)\) is a partially ordered set such that every totally ordered subset \(C\subseteq X\) has an upper bound in \(X\), then \(X\) contains a maximal element.
Theorem 1. The following are equivalent.
Axiom of Choice
Well-Ordering Theorem
Zorn’s Lemma
Proof. WIP
Suppose the well-ordering theorem is true. Let \(\mathcal{A}\) be a collection of nonempty sets. By the well-ordering theorem, there is a relation \(\leq\) on \(\cup\mathcal{A}\) such that \((\cup\mathcal{A}, \leq)\) is a well-ordered set. Let \[f = \{(X,y)\in\mathcal{A}\times\cup\mathcal{A} : y \text{ is the smallest element of } X\}\] Let \(A\in\mathcal{A}\). Then \(A\subseteq\cup\mathcal{A}\). Since \(\cup\mathcal{A}\) is well-ordered, \(A\) has a minimal element \(a\in A\). Then \((A,a)\in\mathcal{A}\times\cup\mathcal{A}\). Since a well-ordered set is totally ordered, \(a\) is the smallest element of \(A\). Since smallest elements are unique, it follows that \(a\) is a unique element such that \((A,a)\in f\). Since \(\mathcal{A}\) and \(A\in\mathcal{A}\) are arbitrary, the Axiom of Choice follows. ◻
Axiom 4 (Alternate Axiom of Choice). For any collection of nonempty pairwise disjoint sets \(\mathcal{A}\), there exists a set \(B\subseteq\cup\mathcal{A}\) such that for each \(A\in\mathcal{A}\), there is a unique \(b\in B\) such that \(b\in A\).
Source File: jakemath.com/latex/sets/axiom_choice.tex